I accept the challenge presented by Blake’s Think Tank, and present my opinion as to why it matters–specifically in Arkansas media–that more women are online than men.
Who are our key media communicators and influencers online in Arkansas: men. And yet a good portion of their readers are likely women. How easily do you think those readers could be swayed to read a female writer who was delivering quality information with a woman’s style of communicating (more friendly, likely more unbiased, a focus on the details in addition to the big picture, incorporation of back-story making the entire piece more personal and personable)? My opinion is that it would only take one strong female media personality online to convince female readers to switch.
Women (across the country and in Arkansas) make the majority of household decisions: what to purchase, where to spend the money and how much to spend. (The only area where they don’t rule when it comes to purchasing power: beer.) More time is going into researching online before buying. And, the opinions of “people like me” are the most trusted. Local media are missing the boat by not touting a female opinion leader in their online spaces. Women want one in Arkansas. And, I am not just talking about mommy-bloggers. Or political gurus. Or movie reviewers. Or business influencers. But we do need all of those. We need to have representatives for women in all stages of life and backgrounds in Arkansas communicating through our media outlets online.
Quality matters. And, personality matters. Men have figured this out. The few women that I have found writing online for our media in Arkansas are conveying neither. Women: tell us who you are and why we should listen to you. Then, deliver on that by providing quality content. You will get the readership. And the men will have to stop ignoring our presence in Arkansas.
“It’s just the texture of the world I live in.” - David Foster Wallace
Interesting article on our media-saturated world over at The Guardian.
How do we combat that pesky DVR fast-forward button that zips our consumers right through our commercials? Product placement in the show! But is it too much? According to an article in BusinessWeek:
“…American Idol has become as much a marketing showcase as musical slugfest. Contestants cavort in rock videos to pitch Fords, troop off to Apple to record iTunes tracks, and answer questions brought to you by AT&T.”
“Three years ago, Idol scaled back its sponsors from five to three to limit ad clutter. But this year it added Apple, figuring it fit the show’s demographic. Meanwhile, advertisers like Ford Motor, which on May 14 unveiled a sportier Focus in a weekly 45-second rock video, became omnipresent. It’s a lot of plugs to get through. Idol showed 4,151 product placements in its first 38 episodes this year according to Nielsen Media Research. That’s up just 4% from ‘07, but the time on screen jumped nearly 19%, to a total of 545 minutes.”
The result? An aging audience for American Idol. Those skeptical youngsters are tuning out the product plugs and moms are tuning in instead: the median age of Idol viewers is now 43.
Over the past several years, there has been much speculation that television advertising will eventually go away. Ratings are down, it is cheaper to buy online advertising–not to mention more targeted–and who watches commercials anyway since the introduction of DVR? BusinessWeek reported on this year’s upfronts:
“A digitized world has crushed the music industry and is not crushing just about every other medium, too. But at least when it comes to the hearts and dollars of advertisers, TV remains the tallest tree in the forest….This is America, and even today nothing announces status quite like being on TV.”
“In reality, many top advertisers are moving dollars away from TV very slowly, if at all.”
Even with all the talk of a coming decline in television advertising, the spending doesn’t seem to reflect the movement yet. What will happen?
Reported in Ad Age.
