February 1, 2008

Mac Guy Reflects Real Mac Owners

Filed under: Advertising, Culture, Current Events, Marketing, Technology — Emily Reeves @ 11:11 am

This is from an article in Advertising Age:

“Research from internet ad network Mindset Media confirms the ad’s personification of Mac users as superior and self-satisfied.  Its recent Mac user ‘mind-set profile’–a psychographic ranking system that scores respondents on 20 different elements of personality–found them to be more assured of their superiority, less modest and more open of the general population.”

“Far fewer cohesive personality traits emerged among PC owners, likely because of the breadth of PC ownership.  Given that 95% or so of all computer users own a PC, those users essentially are the general population.  The one area where PC users did stand out as statistically different was in creativity–low creativity, that is.  Mindset Media found they tend to be realists who are emotionally steady and work well with what they’re given.”

This makes total sense.  I don’t think research really had to be conducted to learn these things, but it is interesting that now there are statistics to confirm it.

Leveraging Product Placement

Filed under: Culture, Marketing — Emily Reeves @ 10:54 am

I saw Juno three times.  It was a great, heart-warming movie–obviously, I loved it.  When you see a movie that many times over a two-week period, you start noticing details that could have been missed.  My thoughts today turned to Tic Tacs.  Paulie Bleeker, the boy who knocks up Juno, had one vice according to Juno: orange Tic Tacs.  Throughout the movie he is eating them and at one point Juno stuffs his mailbox full of them.  I was craving orange Tic Tacs after the third viewing and I couldn’t tell you the last time I even thought about Tic Tacs.

Did the Tic Tac brand pay for that placement?  Are they doing anything to leverage that placement now?  I haven’t seen anything, but they should.

Today I read about a Tic Tac sampling event that encourages consumers to mix music tracks using the sound of Tic Tacs clanging around in their iconic box.  The target for this promotion is 18-24 year olds.  While I get that they are trying to connect music–which is important to this audience–to the Tic Tac brand, it just seems lame after witnessing the connection that Paulie Bleeker and Juno had to Tic Tacs.  That is what Tic Tacs should be using to connect to this audience: Juno.  Why aren’t they leveraging that product placement?

Microtargeting Problems

Filed under: Advertising, Business, Marketing — Emily Reeves @ 10:40 am

The theory behind the popular book Microtrends is being challenged. The book’s theory is that demographic segments as small as 1% of the population can “tip an election” or “spark a movement.” The problems, according to a Brandweek article, include:

  • The results are only as good as the data: many samples are not large or representative enough to accurately reflect the population, subjects self-report behavior and tend to lie (or to say it more kindly, report their aspirational behavior rather than actual behavior).
  • A psychographic splinter group that has one defining trait in common may have just that–one thing in common and nothing else.
  • Within each niche, each person has multiple selves. For example: “Let’s say the research identifies a segment of ‘Thrillseekers,’ and contrasts that against groups who prefer more safety. Who’s to say that the person who jumps out of a plane for kicks will exhibit this same commando attitude toward the prospect of risky sexual behavior?”
  • Marketers can become so obsessed with quirks and fads that they fail to consider their underlying drivers–which are often clues to broader cultural trends far more valuable to the marketer in the long run.

How are these problems overcome?  Think of microtargeting as an “inaugural research step toward a broader targeting strategy–one still aimed, but not exclusionary.”  Brands that have done a good job with this approach:

  • Vans–viewed as cool shoes for everybody that work especially well for skateboarders.  Vans sold the skater “lifestyle.”
  • Apple–manages to be both inclusive and exclusive.  In iPhone spots the viewer never sees a discernible age, race or gender.  “Even the dancing silhouettes in ads for iPods instill a sense of relatability that fully rendered models arguably wouldn’t.”

Conclusion: make sure your brand is speaking to the relevant audience, but don’t ignore or exclude everyone else.

January 28, 2008

Elf Yourself Successful?

Filed under: Advertising, Marketing, That's Just Cool — Emily Reeves @ 4:16 pm

You betcha. At least according the Ad Age. Here are the stats on the ElfYourself viral campaign by OfficeMax:

  • 26.4 million people, nearly 1 in 10 Americans visited the site.
  • 2,614 years–if you were to add up all the time people spent on the site this year.
  • 123 million elves created this year; compared to 11 million last year.
  • 508%–the site’s market share growth over the course of November/December.
  • 16%–the site’s active reach in December (i.e., how many of the 165 million active internet users that month made a visit).

The question is, did this fun campaign help the OfficeMax brand? The answer is, yes:

  • Of the 20 most common search terms in the four weeks of December, six of them included the words “Office Max,” indicating that brand awareness had carried through.

According to Bob Thacker, senior VP-marketing and advertising at OfficeMax: “We were looking to build the brand, warm up our image. We weren’t looking for sales. We are third-place players in our industry, so we are trying to differentiate ourselves through humor and humanization.”

What can other brands learn from this? Provided by Ad Age, here are some viral marketing tips:

  • Make it Personal.
  • Don’t Discount Older Audiences. (40% of all visitors to ElfYourself were 55 or older.)
  • Offer Fun.

Boys Do Cry, But Only At Fiction

Filed under: Culture, Marketing — Emily Reeves @ 11:20 am

In BusinessWeek: “They may say they hate chick flicks, but men can enjoy stories about sacrifice, love, and empowerment, a new study shows. The key, say three marketing professors in February’s Journal of Consumer Research, is keeping the story unreal. The researchers had undergrads read adaptations of poignant stories by O. Henry and others, presenting them as TV scripts. Males showed more empathy and involvement when told the tales weren’t true. Men ‘need to know beyond a doubt that it’s fiction,’ says Jennifer Argo of the University of Alberta School of Business, one of the study’s authors. Exiting reality, she says, ‘is an excuse to relax gender stereotypes’–and emote. Women preferred true stories. The study’s advice to entertainment marketers: Emphasizing that a weepie is fictional may bring in more males. And get a few real men to cry.”